String matching algorithm
String Matching Algorithms: A Friendly Guide
String matching is the backbone of search engines, plagiarism checkers, and even DNA sequencing. The goal? Find a pattern (substring) within a text (larger string).
Here’s a breakdown of key algorithms, from brute force to genius-level optimizations.
1. Brute-Force (Naive) Algorithm
How it works:
Slide the pattern over the text one character at a time.
At each position, check if the pattern matches the current text window.
Example:
Text: "AABAACAADAABAABA"
Pattern: "AABA"
Checks
AABA
at position 0 (match!), then shifts right by 1.
Time Complexity:
Worst case: O(n×m) (if no matches exist).
Pros:
Simple to implement.
Cons:Slow for large texts.
2. Rabin-Karp Algorithm
How it works:
Uses hashing to compare the pattern with text windows.
Computes hash values for the pattern and each text window.
Only checks character-by-character if hashes match (to avoid false positives).
Example:
Text: "GEEKSFORGEEKS"
Pattern: "GEEK"
Hash("GEEK") = some value.
Compare hash with every 4-letter window in the text.
Time Complexity:
Average case: O(n + m).
Worst case: O(n×m) (if all hashes collide).
Pros:
Efficient for multiple pattern searches (like plagiarism checks).
Cons:Hash collisions can slow it down.
3. Knuth-Morris-Pratt (KMP) Algorithm
How it works:
Preprocesses the pattern to create a prefix table (LPS array).
Uses this table to skip unnecessary comparisons.
Key Idea:
If a mismatch occurs, KMP knows how much to shift the pattern without rechecking.
Example:
Text: "ABABDABACDABABCABAB"
Pattern: "ABABCABAB"
LPS table helps skip redundant checks.
Time Complexity:
O(n + m) (linear time!).
Pros:
No backtracking in text.
Great for long patterns.
Cons:Slightly complex to implement.
Comments
Post a Comment